IMGpapers 1976–79

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1976–79

Why object

Red Weekly No. 166, 16 September 1976 · p. 2 of the scan · 211 words

The scan: rw-no166-sep-16-1976.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 5-6 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 2 of the scan

to gay banner?

When the marchers arrived we were gr applause, cheers and solidarity, and we tacked ourselves on to •the back or tne marc We were then approached by one of the stewards who asked us to take down our CHe banner only "Right to Work' banners union banners had been allowed banners saying 'Gays' Right to Work march we had already "A Woman's by re- excluded Apparently the only groups by the organisers were regional ones. Why did they insist on making a sacred cow-out of geographica allowing specific minority groups to clare their solidarity?

During the apore annual rituals, times by different people wanting us remove our banner, though theirs. could see other groups, such as old age nave been.

salutes have taken them.

. The reason he gave was that allowed, Jane taut on int heard that anu Work" had beer are women and some recognised Led. We disagree rather than Like women, And our 100s demonstration outside the that KnOW where the TUC was performing its Torced by variou , we were approached several are tactics • Ta as We especially in areas CUTTIne DUDIC And wher single people 01 THE WOme! march were men or whites make we are invisible tre asi homosexual

← You're right - IS memberCorpses →

Something wrong on this page?