Tam writino to correct ine wrong impression of the struggle against which was given *Fare Fight -up Reainst me Law (Red Weeklv. 13 Januarv].
The number of bus and tube two reasons for this Davment silos invoive conductors in a vast amount of extra paper work which may have to be done in their own time, there is a fixed time allocated for ITs completion second, ine approacnes to the unions concerned been less than tactful, and have TON oreanisation rare ron or many who support the principle of colElecting lower, or no, Court NUR and the former District article orecipilate - апо tions of some "Fare-Fight' supporters have made our struggles withthe union for lower fares more There are difficult.
First, the which effectively disrupted Picket collector at the end do Underground fare you have a right to] made nave which will form and siderable congestion.
CADY NUH LOnGOn
District Council).
sation' of the media or the building of 'alternative' structures (imporan as the after werein the yous. that we hope much of the subsequent torums will be concerned • SUNDAY 6 February, 7pm: Paul Walton [co-author of Bad News] on 'The Mass Media and the Class Struggle: London C0-02 44 Fizroy koad, Nwi [Chalk Farm tube/ Primrose Hill BR].
CARL Healy to
----- pull-quotes -----
workers supporting 'Fare Fight' is in fact extremely small