In his reply to the National Union but then goes on to describe Kurdish struggle as insoltecov 'blind nationalism'. This is, to say chauvinists (the leaders of the cecades.
sustained struggle a ey, have had - Iraq, Syria, Turkey and Iran;
case of the USSR, inereis aiso a suostantia Kurdist population, is one about which close rellance on tne snan or irar Ward it was precisely sighted opportunism which led to doubtless temporary, nevertheless significant, setback the Kurds been fighting between Baghdad and Teheran.
If the Kurdish struggle is illegitreceiveo wom wan. what doout ud obviously both] could Palestinian movement, specialise in pseudo-radical demWHere in order.
estinians? Is this what they mean this short- when they say that the Ba'ath's but Zionism'?
SUB BaSa attention
auden uranian Baghdad were closed as a result Measure * If, as they maintain, the Kurds WHICh IS are quite happy to remain under raqi rule and the unrest is due to a lew bloodthirsty Lastly, since the NUIS seems to and CIA agents, why doesn't the Very simple questions stem to be all the mastersion which are the Ba'ath's hallmark, * Is the NUIS aware that Iraqi they know they would get no more
----- pull-quotes -----
The is % TeCh Kunde hare honey mode Ener no, here had the metonune te