IMGpapers 1976–79

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1976–79

I0O REVOLUTION WEST AND EAST

Red Weekly No. 195, 21 April 1977 · p. 9 of the scan · 1,503 words

The scan: rw-no195-apr-21-1977.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 4-7 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 9 of the scan

review of Livio Maitan's Party, the fareweil to the illasions in the progressive role of Manism: JeanPaul Sartre, in an interesting. H somewnat confused and inaccurate "socialism in one country"in an important interview, Ernest Mandel consideri the experienoe and problems of proletarian revolutionary atruggles in Europe Sinee 1917 Despise Lhe many riches of the issue, however, one contribution really stands our head shoulders above the rest - a truly magnificent essay on Gramsci by Perry Anderson.

DEBATE This article amount to an over view of a whole series of the moNt Fundamental debates the revolutionary Marxist movement — Luxembarg againsi Kaursky. Boisbeviks and Mensheviks on strategy in Russia, the debate in the Comintern on Uniter early 1920, in the USSR SLUES R TSW NE CECITUE ary strategics, within this frame work, is the assertion primacy of puliics. famous and profound dictum of Lenin's sah Pounes mus take precoa cnce over economics. To othetwise is to forget the ABC of Marxism" has already been given carefully weighted phrasing against a contemporary idoological background in Anderson's Foreword to Lineager of the Absolutisr Stare where he asserts: secular stragale berwcen classes is ultimately resOi-cO aE lle pontc -not the coonomnic or cultural - level of socicty."

The significance of the essay on Uransci b that this baric conclu. sion of historical materialism is tared trom an aplorism into a sustained analysis of the necessary such a Furtherinare. inlike Anderson's Lineages of th Absolutist Stare and Considerudions on Western Marnism, this is carried our not with stidied ambiguities or straightfarward constructure of bourgeois class power Anmy and Macses in Chini, marks in merropolitan capitalism?" (p4L)

The firit answer to this quesNOU MAICI ALCHH and one which today forme the •Licorchcal anderpinning af urd Communist Party of Great Brirain passago neoecal 15 trat:

In the East (of Europe includm Kussar lue seate mas cren thing, civil society was primordial and gelatinois: in the wes ken was a proper relationship between Siale and civil sociery and when the State trembled a stundy stric ture of civil society was ar once revenled. The Stare was only ab outer dich, hehind which there was a powertul system of fortres and carthworks."

Notebooks p.238 cited Anderson plD)

From such a concept quite clear SERENA COM UNS OW *The superseructures of civil NS arC eC LILI SANCTIS of modern warfare, In war it and recen ANTONIO GRAMSCI wolld hanren somelmes thata fierce artillery atrack seemed o have destroyed the enemy's entire defensive system, whereas in fact it bad only destroyed (be ouler surface of it; and at the moment of their advanoe and asshilants would tind themselves confronsed by a line of defenen which was still effective.' (Prison Notebonks p214 cited Anderson p9) exercisins Violence and cnercior Againsı this the first. ihcorchicall soeaking the mos explores, fundamental, theie of Anderson is the assertion and demonstration 1. lt is in the nature of the communism in general and the bourgecis stare that, in any final contest, the arined apparatuses of represon tackprapiy asptuce e ideological appararuses of parliapentan represcnrunon, 1o rooccupy the dominant position in LL SErOL UTE B CIAII CIa power. The coercive State machine is the ultimiste barnier ioa worcers revolution, and can only be hraken by pre-ctnglive counter-coercion (776)

In shart it is necossary to speak not of the decentinand clement in the last instance being consent but capitalis state in the final instance by coercion. " (p77) (Prison INEVITABLE Gramsci limself of course never questioned that revolutionary violenoe was inevitable and necessary However for the present CPs the correct poinr, considered in isal HERoi, Lat Lne reduced lo larmed hodies of men is uscd in redirey to deny that, in the last instance, the state is hased oi pocrcion Anderson statch Lhe real character of such a position succinetly:

.. To forget the "fundament al" or determinant role of violeno wichin the power final lastanoe is to regress to The task of Anderson in reinrioo to this reformist however primarily one of defence of what he task with precision, The real originalite and contribution of the essay howerer and in this it builds work of NeLeft Review, is it assertion of the pontical boc merel in cocrcion Du in deteribicing consenr. The dom IAtion o bolilics asserls itsel oo merely io the Jast instance and the cinsh of armed force atlack tbe maintaining the сосланов от copial.

It is this which, following Lenin, radicals matks randes s expos itian aff from any form delcrntination of the state cannot be structure of Distornon E until although he achieves this remarkable force and of the soviers on previous primacy of the circlee:

but day to day capital and of

Jean-Paul Sartre

Ergo sindicaasoi or coimomim. issue ol defining a specifically polirical orientation cannot be put off the final clash today working on a crude combination of economic and social agitation until finally comes the emergence - but becomes the at ail phases of the struggie. As this A.L.L.. analysis is cruciat it is worth citing me or the most contral pessas tull soderson slals ibe 1 ing ot s tant socat-or eran militant social-demecratic Exmerience shows that. electatis never produce a governmen dodicated lo the exoronristion a the realisation af socialism... What is the reason for this parados? lt muse lie in the argues: ODY SUCUIOECA CORONAnInE D CiaHaISIT.

ADRiE Sтi0O -of.Srase.'(p28)

The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci Marxist Analysis of China Revolutionary Strategy in Europe Socialism in One Country Raymond Williams Post-war British Marxism the prolerariat before the electoral ary Marxist chemes. Ir leads logio moment as wach, The central locu of power must therefore be sought: questions of the united front, dual within civil society abose all, in capitalist control of the means of communicorion.. based on control of the meuns of production, (ln more sopbisticated vari- Review is ao approptiate point at ants on commodity fetishism -Ver whether the primary cmpbasis is given to the effect of cultural or economic appararases, the analytic conclusion is the came It is the strategic nexur of civil society winch is bebeed to main. tain capitalist begemony within a political democracy:" (p27)

ILLUSIONS in contrast lo this Anderson This characteristic sundrome of lefi social-democracy contains u busuber of allosions. The fiest and most inmodate of it erors is precisely the cocion that the ideological power of the bourgeoisic in Western sociai formations is exerciser ahove all in the splicce of civil sociey, its hegemony over which subsequently neutraliscs the democratie potential of the represeneative stare.. In fact, ir might he said that the truth is if anything the inverse: the general form of the representative Stare - hourgeais democracy → is itself the principal ideological lynchpin of Western anose sey deprives che working class of the idea of socialismn as a different type CONCLUSION Ir is nos possible ro go into a full examanabon Di this COTLILSICIE here. Properiy integrated ino an ally in its last sectian to power and other central Tratskyist concepts which Anderson takes up in the finat section Finally the 1001h sasue New Lef woicE to ascs tic trajcelon Dl that journal and the work of in editor. From the point of view of theory Anderson's recent only congrm whar was alrend knawn. A long time hefore he •PIULL II CS DRamE PCR Anderson was the most importam Marxist policicat theorisc in Beilale - the most original in ideas, the most coberent in execution, and the most embraciog and compre hensive in vision.

But Marxist theery is bot th SmE E ParT nOMICS. Tt is unfortunately quite passible COMENE OTIOLE IA EEC ITEMIEI renegacy in the second— Lukics is TELCI SOU SES CIOR InCITON Pickhanoe, Hilferding, Bauer and Kaursky oimarda. Anderson, escablisting the primacy of tho political yardstick, sel be ts finally docisise ceilcria by which his own mack must he jodgod.

On ibis terrain tbe eseay on Gramsci macks a gunttorive step forward, In a period when varioas OWHCHICUME TOCS CEHE British Marxist left have confront ec the upsurge of the Europea working class by retrearing inlo sconomics. philnsanhy and cu ture, New Left Rewew has set itself the task of analysiog the dominam demens of the class strusele -that of polinies.

In the present essay Anderson deans the line clearly on a number of fundamental issues with any reformis or centrist interpreta To transform and integrate thes práctice roquires far more than LECUIE BESIMOMCE BIST pages of print. Howeser in this contribution. and the words are chosen with care, Perry Anderson has given us ane af the mon important essays on revolutionary political theory än Western Europe since the death ol Trotsky. No DO UCOH MAn aEe PRAC D stralegs in the West CHEIU HC TQCHSHC WHE seriaur dialogue en revolutionary

----- pull-quotes -----

Raymond Williais summarises in particolat, l that some of the debares on the Brish Eriain passnges of Oraml left in the post war period. Finally, Boiled down 1o barest tals the mos crucal of thee

Perry Anderson Fred Halliday Ernest Mandel

← Poles apartTrotskyists come home →

Something wrong on this page?