IMGpapers 1976–79

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1976–79

SAND

Socialist Challenge No. 120, 1 November 1979 · p. 6 of the scan · 123 words

The scan: sc-n120-nov-01-1979.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 3-3 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 6 of the scan

and this could claim benefit or A victory for us? I would say the chapel representatives have held their My section goes back with a pay rise of over 50 per cent, but this has to be seen in the context of the rest of During the preceding four years, Thomson was the only which stuck rigidly to pay restraint.

There isn't a clear indication of how many jobs have been lost - the FoCs are keeping the figures close to We're losing 90 out of 540 shifts in the machine room. That's the loss of Saturday night to produce the Sunday come in here on cent.

If no one volunteers to go, then it will be through attrition intake months.

← BBC weighs its workers'RADIO 2 OUT OF CHAS WIL SALISBURY TROOPS END BBC SANCTION →

Something wrong on this page?