IMGpapers 1976–79

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1976–79

Slogans

Socialist Challenge No. 121, 8 November 1979 · p. 13 of the scan · 320 words

The scan: sc-n121-nov-08-1979.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 2-2 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 13 of the scan

question where the two previous plans diverge, Thatcher and Carrington side with their Labour predecessors than Smith •Muzorewa: The government unequivocal that it is Britain's task to decolonise — a proposition roundly rejected by the Patriotic Front in its pre-conference statement of position.

Decolonisation would be super• Visc Dy oreign troops as a wav of dealing with liberation fighters who rejected the settlement. be British but would far more likely be Commonwealth as envisaged under me Ango-American plan. just coincidence that Carrington had secret talks with delegates from India, Nigeria and Jamaica at Lusaka? These were the countries destined to send troops under the Owen-Young plan.)

Finally, just to remind participants at Lancaster House of the rich prize of a successful Thatcher is oftering the old Zimbabwe Development dressed up in the new £600m 'Commonwealth Resertlement Fund'.

What is missing from all this is any recognitie softhe wishes and rights of the Zimbabwean people themselves.

Smith only 'internal settlement' among the white population, British government is determined that the 'solution' will be foisted on the people of Zimbabwe from outside.

SUNDAY gives and the Solually criticised 'No Tory 'sell-out' problem!

may well be in a minority 1n These could assessment of the (Was 'Hands Off Zimbabwe'.

That may relationships, Shadow Foreign Shore. neo-colonial Not direct anti-imperialist Fund guise of the campaign for vietnam, Milt forces. held the Given the referendum so the DEMONSTRATE 11 NOVEMBER Victory to the Patriotic Front No sell-out in Zimbabwe Hands off Zimbabwe No collaboration with the Muzorewa-Smith regime Sanctions must stay ASSEMBLE 1.30 PM SPEAKERS CORNER MARCH TO RALLY IN TRAFALGAR SQUARE However, we do think our analysis.

insight into the shortcomings of previous slogans of HOVCHCHEL.

Tory Sell-out Zimbabwe' when it was first coined and we think that time has shown that hardly the Of course, we recognise that we

----- pull-quotes -----

14th anniversary of UDI Support the Zimbabwe liberation struggle

← Korean coup - made in the USASAN →

Something wrong on this page?