IMGpapers 1976–79

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1976–79

Sack the AUEW executive!

· Socialist Challenge No. 126, 13 December 1979 · p. 2 of the scan · 310 words

The scan: sc-n126-dec-13-1979.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 2-7 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 2 of the scan

AUEW Chiswick No 2 Branch all the national handling of the sacking contmucs lo mount.

Among the and to remove the executive all those THE number of branches of the Engineering Union seeking to remove executive over Derek latest call for support for Robinson and for a ballot - which is presently conducting an inquiry into Leyland's charges against the sacked convenor — are branches in sourn, day, Sheffield, Greenwich, Southampton, and the Chiswick No 2 branch.

Rule 15, paragraph 5 of the union rule book provides for a recall ballot if 10 per cent or more of the branches call for it.

A two-thirds majority vote of the membership in a ballot would then be order dismiss executive, including Terry Duffy, the union president, who is leading scabbing operation against Robinson.

But at a meeting of the North London AUEW Broad Left on SaturLa leading Communist member in the union argued against the moves to recall the executive. George Anthony, president of the union's North London because the right-wing executive was likely to win it. He maintained that we should simply fight for strike action to gain Robinson's reinstatement. Anthony also considered that the the executive would use a technicality find the sacked convenor 'guilty the charges laid by BL management.

Party Anthony's argument should not I besupported. While we certainly need district, said divisive, strike action lies.

challenging in the back Fi to of would wing. the call for a ballot makes it clear where the blame for demobilising the Exercising the basic union right of national executive over the way it has stabbed Robinson to directly call the executive to order.

Even if the executive wins a ballot, the left in the AUEW would be able to put the issues on the table. . And that help prepare campaign against the re-election of the right

← No British solution for ZimbabweNationalisation from Meccano parts? →

Something wrong on this page?