IMGpapers 1976–79

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1976–79

What the left press said BIG FLAME

Socialist Challenge No. 26, 1977 · p. 22 of the scan · 496 words

The scan: sc-n26-dec-15-31-1977.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 5-6 of 6; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 22 of the scan

A Selection of Recent Titles For example, the sexist, racist, and anti-working class phenomena Santa Claus/Claudia CANTEEN WORKERS ON HUNGER STRIKE THE LACK of popular appeal of Socialist Challenge was never more obvious than in its Xmas sue. As a tew copi found their way by -aocident of factors canteens in Liverpoal and workers embarked on hunger strike "What a load of old cobblers. said Jim Jones, a shop steward of many years standing. Jim, sho was educated at Canter bury Univerxity, told us that the Amas issue had set the strugale hack many years.

In housing estates and tenements the reaction was stronger. "IT IS accident", said Molly, who has been involved in many tosses' newleft review AN INNOVATIVE critique af this text is, to say the least, problemacic, • The anguishie antinomy confronting much of the British left clearly manifests itself in the lacune of this particular dewvre: wherher within a specific conjuncture it poses the probleur of the transformation of the qualita tise to quantitative within the framework of the contradiction hereoch intoritative analysis and analytical information; whether such a contradiction is antagonistic or noo-antagobistic; or whether it is simply a lapsus in the epistemological COLUTERUC Wellan, schanng. Тітралаго perboently poses the problem in his devastatingly relevant critique of Freud's pechopathology: why exoriare the original rext? Why indeed? The anwer certaints isn't in my Latio primer, but the parallels with this opus are striking. Or, as Poultantzas once put it, in a dazzling trompe /ocil: La plume de ma taile est sur le disputes over the past lift that this lot have Ignored us in this issue' At a protest moeling called Tational Senearin corades tenants, Big Flame explained that they sympathis.

ed with the teriants point or view. We're not involved in the paper' snid one BF leader. This remnark wal greeled by loud cheers. After a three hom session it was decided nor to burn all copies in the area. Half the meeting adjourned for midnight mass, while the rest retired to discuss how to take the campaign forward.

Next week: Socialist Challenge pots its case.

bureau de mon onale". (Clesses in Contemporary Capitalison p. 2314), Bon mor, Nicos: The pncase loses much in trans lation, but the underlying verisimilitude is incontro vertible. The ironically entitled 'game" on the centre spread epitomises the object Poulantzas cricique: the quasi-Borges labyrinthine strncture serves as a model of SUIC vulgar materialism pervades the British left. On bught almost believe that the auteurs had never heard of th transformation problem or the tremendous amount of unproacetive labour we are engaged in. As Marx originally wrote: The Marxists have changed the world; the point however & 1o interpret ir. This sharply pose the dichotomy between Heed and Kant that Marx wrestling with in 1843 wher he. (contined on page 25] * Socialistsche Herousford erung Weinochten Nwmmer (London 1977). (An English translation of this review will be published next vear hy New Left Books, price

← WorkerTHE PROPHET RETURNED →

Something wrong on this page?