"MY GOOD FELLOW, YOU'RE ONLY ALLOWED TO SCREAM UNDER TORTURE I THIS IS meRELY ' INHUMAN TREATMENT', SO PULL YOURSELF TOGETHER. " righteous violence.' internment policy, relevance, reports GEOFF BELL. Unholders of the right of the people to self-determination ceased holding illusions in British justice But continental Europe was a little more distant; the ruling class there were not so directly involved in oppressing Irish women and men. Perhaps Justice could be found in Strasbourg.
Some in Ireland were quick to inslit that this was occurred at the Human Rights court last week, The Fianna tal Government argued the Judgenient. must be welcom ed by all who are interested In the human agreed: The European Court if Human Rights is now seen to be creating standards for the protection of the individual against the abuse of stale power.
TORTURE This is nonsense. Stasbourg's verdict gave none of the reassurances which ageing Iberals are: always cager. to insist are obtainable through bourgeois legal channels. The most headline calching decision was that Brilain had not tortured in the carly days of bytheRUC internment, but had merely indulged in Inhuman and degrading treatment Al one level the differenc can he reduced to one of semantics. The dictionary delines 'inhuman" as "cruci, barbarous, savage. But the difference not about dictionary definitions.
The "quiet satisfaction with which the British Government is reported to have reacted to Strashpure's verdice underloo the importance of being acquitted of torture. "Torture' aureling tester oberat sometling Western democracies just do not do, while inhuman" treatment carries connotations that thing: merely got a bit out of hand The verdict was all the more as Britain had not contested the torture allegation, in effect, Britain pleaded gully, Tound it was innocent. wonder Amnesty International is severely critical of the SEXUALISE.
PREJUDICIAL Orher decisions European court were equally prejudicial. The Irish Covernment had complained that Internment discriminated in favour of Loyalists, The coun Would nave none of that li spoke of profound differences between Lovalist and Renubl ican terrorists*, adding in 1970 and 1971 the community included political pressure groups with extremist tendencies but apparents concealed within its rank no underground military forces akin to the IRA.
The facts of the violence in Ireland from 1969-71 show the hollowness of this claim. first borhs were planted by Loyalists, attempt to discredit the liberal' Unionists in power. The first killings were committed by Loyalists. The Ulster Volunter Force existed from 1966 and was selectively certoe 1r0m: 1909 onwards Bur as with the corture Over a hundred years ago the Irish radical and land agitator Michael Davitt wrote: "The long history of Ireland proclaims aloud that the only way to obtain justice for Ireland is through the illegal use of The verdict announced last week by the European Court of Human Rights on the early days of Britain's give Davitt's words a timely charge, the British argument was accepted. Those supported the British presence #go. in Ireland, however much violence they usod, were only "hooligans" and did not merit VERDICTS Of the 17 judges, only the Irish and one other said discrimination was practised. On the torture acquittal there were four dissenters, Ireland, Austria, Greece and Cyprus. The last three are not in toc Common Market; the people of the last two have thei experience of torture, and position to deliberate Britain's treatment of rebels Two verdicts were mous. The first that no evidence had been presented that Britain was still 'ill. treating" LES Ireland. At no time COURSELLE evidence, Had they they would have quickly found that such respectable figares a 2wvers: ponde surecons an Chusch leaders in the North of Ireland have recently protested about the treatment of suspects The other unanimous verdict ways ine most mportant of all. Britain, tho declared, had been justified in adopting policy internment without trial, They August 1971 had threatened the life of the nation. INTERNMENT was a strange considering internment which led eventually led to the abolition of the Northern parliament. But the real point about that verdict was that it cotally avoided the issuc - that wis the practices of the reland state which caused the popular resistance government in the first place The decision of the judge at Strasbourg to justify internment is not surprising. If Britain had not been justified, by the same reasoning Ireland would not have been justified in setting up no-jury courts to deal with Republicans in that part of The same reasoning can be judge who deliberated Strasooure. I Britain was no justitied in abolishing trial by jury, could Westero Germany not be criticised for its present adoption of the 'Strong State'? No ruling class in Western Eurape would want a decision al Strasbourg which questioned their right to abolish the right of'a lair trial whenever they felt the need.
Oh DO. said tbe learned judges of 17 Western fair trial is not a principle. The The Sie CaRs whenever it feels it is necessary.
This decision Takes bourg's verdict away from the presence in Ireland. Last week He Ter to norwal was renal: and openly abolished Western democracy. I was that serious, who own unaniopponents in did the invite such done so verdict it was to a0 Northern -10 the The Irish Civil War Irish Troops Out Movement has just published a longihy pamphlet by Frances M. Blake. The Irish Civil War meanstorine in sh peop e. The demo- pamphlet covers the period of 1922-1923 Ireland spainsl the British imposed solution' to the Irish what it wabl question.
With wall-produces HustraStrastons and at only 30p it is the bargain of the yoar.
Other Price 30p plus 10p pap by 1922-1923 party.
De achieved Protestant troops London United what it still SLP's line war in official Labour alisa.
Available Bookshop, STRASBOURG O'MAHONY the recent formation of a new political Nç A new Labour Party
----- pull-quotes -----
the PrObe lion Deliberal Irish Time
STOP HIM !!! STOP HIM!!!