IMGpapers 1976–79

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1976–79

Ilford- a different view

Socialist Challenge No. 36, 9 March 1978 · p. 14 of the scan · 425 words

The scan: sc-n36-mar-9-1978.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 2-3 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 14 of the scan

The political the 'fullest freedom', FEsland and of the anti-fascists Again.

by Simon banning ruciulist conference.

requites them to do, marches therehy peter can be intact als porters can be contacted De cine 1 MUST protest against your lack of balanced judgement ou the ilford the National Front, but a qualific the MeNgels indiscriminate ban might Challenge, however, found nothing and clearly regard them as a defeat, to which the ANE contrhuted. BaaT Grogan even says that the fasciats had "the milest tresdom 1:1 Whie the len had the "biggest repressive force for ANY CUTLOR RICT WAACE To say as you do, that the ban was judgement. Everybody chows that it was the NE who wanted to march in llford. Far from having ENCY stopped from doing so. In stopping he NE, the police, as even you admit were acting under the pressure, not of some movement to ban all demos, but those who fought at Lewisham and Ladywood, those, including MPs, demanding a baron racist marches, and the 10,000 people who threatened to turn up if NF were allowed to go ahead But the police are not yet ready to concede us that point. So instead of Spirit i nee the letter of the law tit marches, chey ban all pretending to be "neutral'. By wildly lashing out against marches of every description for the next twa months, they aim to damage the labour movement. Yet YORKSHIRE 300 3151 Been Wall-am Clubi, Norte Challenge UNDEE: Intermatiorabout Sociali go activities lon 031-346 0465 1 01 43595 1aher 6071. indiscriminate ban. The pressure for increase in the future. At the same time it will ref harder for anvone lo defend an NE march anywhere from Your contributors see none of this. They get very worked up about the military hardware in ford, the public display of new toys and gadgets. Bur the show of military strength conceals the deeper political dilemmas and are now fighting No. will Saturday having peaceful activities within the terms of MeNce's instructions, avoidine the ELPF's mundless muitarism, doing a mass canvass of Ilford, and in laying the foundations for a fight against the form of the present ban.

DAVE BAILEY (London]

only we had every interest on absolutely functionalism and political dogma that has made me recoil from other Felt babers Such tenors can ant undermine the intellectual whole aspires lo achieve.

BRIAN CONNOLLY (N. 10] Point taken. Wo have received numerous complaints from socialist teachers on the same report •ED.

----- pull-quotes -----

Eaten Shese latin: SCOTLAND

← Conference on politics educationExamine yourselves render off, hate been farsurancy →

Something wrong on this page?