It is ilso right to point out that a truly mass party. solely through individual ment. But when importance of a of an ambiguity present elsewbere in the text; unions or the Labour Party?
Given the transparently obvious fact that the rank and file are not to be found in the Labour Party wards, any emphasis on the Labour Party as the locus of this "break' can diversion from the work that needs doing.
Equally if the trade unions are meant, this gives a centrality lo th VILIDEDCHI SESHIC recruitthe SECONd "break in the mass the trade reference to the Party organisations to interests of working people If this means tha only he a pulling socialist Thus when the document gocs on to organisation being clear on the unite: front approach and on the need for rank and file organisations to be noncan agree is refreshing to see that the Labour Party is mentioned in this context by need to ger Labour do act in thi it is important politically to get local Labour Partie involved in supporting anti-tasci campaigas, anti-curs committees, and so on, this marks a welcome change demands socialist democracy autonomous movements the TOTICES the correct positions Socialist Challenge which mark one of its greatest political strengths.
The section on "class struggle lef wings* is subject to the made above - incidentally just bow differ these utobomous rank and tie mose ments, except that most workers hav some clue what you mean by che rank and file, but couldn't tell a CSLW from the man in the moon?
And where do you ger this bizarre TORONTO EDELICE COCCIDE of the SWP rank and file approach -in what documents or texts has this CONFERENCE NATIONAL