IMGpapers 1976–79

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1976–79

How con descending!

Socialist Challenge No. 78, 11 January 1979 · p. 14 of the scan · 449 words

The scan: sc-n78-jan-11-1979.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 1-2 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 14 of the scan

YOUR 'Open Forum' on other revolutionary traditions (16 November) was the worst form of condescension. In asking that question one would have expected either concrete examples or a debate. But no! Your only 'proof that non-Trotskyists can be revolutionists is that Trotsky said so Similarly, the article by Cannon on splits and regroupment was from the narrow Trotskyist standpoint. On the failure of reunification with some other group all he could say was: *After seven years... changed their position on the Soviet Union.' Trotsky defines sectarianism (in the Transitional Programme) as socialists who have only convinced themselves of their socialist programme. Most "Trotskyists' suffer from just this today.

TONY SHARP [Liverpool] Mary Marxism they had not longer in NAG. the NALGO Action Group.

PARLOUS TIMES 4. NAG is in fact a rank and file political current in NALGO (one of several) and not 'the union's rank and file group'. It has proved by and large to be hostile to the unity of the left in NALGO. That is one of the reasons why I, and many other people, are no Whilst it is true that the strike needs to be supported by other unions and departments, those of us who are on strike have been working to do this for months. It is, of course, a lot despite names or pretensions.

At the other end of the scale are the situations parties alignments form out of the major events of the class struggle. Thus the Comintern established drawing all those supported the October revolution and saw the need to construct a WaS after parties had been formed that the political fight was waged to transform them into Bolshevik parties, capable of leading the working class and On the contrary, unify theory and practice is in and classical tradition of Marxism.

support can be gleaned from the Marxist tradition position, which, rather, is an effusion who from the economist/syndicalist and politically underdeveloped tradition of the British labour movement these In the early 20th century, the page of the German SPD organ Neue Zei reverberated with just such polemic: as we see in Socialist Challenge today, but on a much vaster scale. the attempt to the No ence.

for Kerry's moved from Birmingham and Mersseyside to have a recall ANL conferThe motivation was that the steering committee was undemocrati and accountable to no-one; that two major initiatives had been rather badly cocked up (Remembrance Day and Brick Lane); and that we need a clear line on immigration controls. Unfortunately none of those criticisms related to trade union work, nor were they drawn out of the previous discus. sions that had taken place.

I voted for a recall conference be

← Mason attacks Burntollet marchRank and file in NALGO →

Something wrong on this page?