IMGpapers 1976–79

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1976–79

Soweto 11 framed for sedition

Socialist Challenge No. 84, 22 February 1979 · pp. 11-12 of the scan · 245 words

The scan: sc-n84-feb-22-1979.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 1-5 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 11 of the scan

By. our Foreign Staff THE Soweto uprising of 1976 still looms over South African politics. The regime is trying to assign the "blame' for rebellion and distract other troubles — with the resumption of the Soweto trial The trial of 11 student leaders, which has restarted after a two month break, is aimed at proving that they responsible WCIC seditiously stirring up the black Although sedition the law offence the also face charges of conspiracy incitement to sedition the Assemblies Act and participation in terrorist activities under the Terrorism Act. just These statutory provide a convenient smear.

for The prosecution has made no attempt to prove, for example, that the accused 'persons in the making of petrol bombs for poses or that they introduced a commit "terrorist or terrorists to the Riotous students.

Equally the defence does not that the involved offences number of the demonstrations and stay-aways cited by prosecution instructed that the 11, destructive purhave never movement over were anyone else COLYCHCHL the opponents of the regime.

What this all adds up to is who have been detained since July, are on trial for political views which they speakers from denied and as movements. representatives of a political which they activists. more control than in 'Sedition' and 'terrorism' are epithets for

page 12 of the scan

IN H7I after conviction.

They may be treated differently, , but this does not make mem pontical prisoners Even the British government does in one way admit that

← Zimbabwe conference Will Smith surviveUnion solidarity →

Something wrong on this page?